reference
Research Evidence Map
Purpose and authority
The 118-source/929-claim extraction inventory is a discovery and review aid. The extraction inventory originates from the private research library. Generated claims, summaries, labels, and selected quotations are discovery aids only. The inventory preserves generated extraction output so that later review can locate material, but it does not establish the accuracy, relevance, adoption, or authority of any extracted item.
Extraction QA acceptance is not corpus authority. Direct verification against the canonical primary document remains required before corpus promotion. A reviewer must check the relevant material in context before it can support a chapter claim, an appendix conclusion, or a lineage status. No lineage entry or chapter claim has been promoted in this phase.
Coverage
The preservation inventory has 118 sources; the bibliography represents 116 works; two preservation records are intentionally excluded from the bibliography. The inventory also contains 929 claims and 718 evidence snippets. Extraction QA records 107 QA-accepted extraction records and 11 low-evidence records; the associated claim split is 896 accepted and 33 low-evidence claims.
The promotion-status split is 105 discovery-only, 11 quarantined-low-evidence, and 2 quarantined-excluded source records. For claims, it is 881 discovery-only, 33 quarantined-low-evidence, and 15 quarantined-excluded claims. Its claim disposition is 914 represented claims and 15 intentionally excluded claims.
icn-0096 and icn-0116 remain excluded from the bibliography and the review
queue. They remain in preservation material so that the inventory is auditable,
but neither is a candidate for corpus use.
Relationship to the corpus
The bibliography in references.md identifies the represented works. lineage.md records the current ancestry statuses, and source-integration-register.md states the source-authority boundary. open-questions.md remains the register for unresolved corpus positions. This inventory changes none of those positions.
First primary-document review queue
| Cluster | Source IDs queued | Review question |
|---|---|---|
| Polycentric governance and Ostrom | icn-0013, icn-0030, icn-0035, icn-0042, icn-0058, icn-0081, icn-0087 | Which material survives contextual primary-document review, and which identifies conceptual correspondence without ancestry? The extraction set contains no work titled or authored by Ostrom; direct Ostrom verification must use the canonical bibliography, not this ledger. |
| Beer’s Viable System Model | icn-0071 | Does the source support a precise comparison with the HAO structure without implying historical influence? |
| Holonic manufacturing | icn-0068, icn-0069, icn-0077, icn-0083 | Which autonomy, cooperation, and recursion properties correspond to HAO units? |
| Beyond Budgeting | icn-0072, icn-0082, icn-0085, icn-0086, icn-0102 | Which devolved-authority material is supported, and what limits or adoption failures qualify it? |
| Worker-cooperative law | icn-0016, icn-0017, icn-0037, icn-0040 | Which entity-form statements remain accurate in their stated jurisdiction and publication context? |
Review rule
Queue membership sets review priority only. It does not establish verification, adoption, truth, support for a corpus position, or evidence of ancestry. A claim that fails direct primary-document verification is rejected rather than weakened into an unattributed corpus assertion.